1855 Knollcrest Circle SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49546-4402 USA
On the campus of Calvin University
© 2026 Calvin Institute of Christian Worship
Every person who enters Christian worship brings more than a body into the room. We bring our histories, relationships, memories, fears, wounds, hopes, and expectations. For some worshipers, those histories include trauma.
You may have encountered the phrase “trauma-informed worship” and wondered what it means. Trauma-informed worship is not a new theology or a replacement for historic Christian worship. Rather, it is an expression of faithful pastoral worship that takes seriously the embodied realities of worshipers, seeks to remove unnecessary barriers to participation, preserves agency, and acknowledges both the church’s capacity to heal and its capacity to cause harm.
Trauma-informed worship does not make trauma the center of worship. God remains the center. Instead, it asks what it means to worship God faithfully when the people gathered before God carry the realities of their lives—including trauma—with them.
This reflection will first consider what trauma is and why it matters for worship. It will then define trauma-informed worship, explore its connection to the church’s priestly calling, offer practical suggestions for implementation, and finally consider some of its inherent challenges and limitations.
Trauma is not the same as suffering. While all trauma involves suffering, not all suffering results in trauma. Suffering is an unavoidable reality of human life, at least until Christ’s return, and it represents the shared human experience of pain and adversity.
The American Psychological Association’s APA Dictionary of Psychology defines trauma as:
any disturbing experience that results in significant fear, helplessness, dissociation, confusion, or other disruptive feelings intense enough to have a long-lasting negative effect on a person’s attitudes, behavior, and other aspects of functioning.¹
The APA notes that traumatic events may be caused by human behavior, such as rape or war, or by natural events, such as earthquakes. Trauma can also refer to serious physical injury.
It is helpful to distinguish several ways the word trauma is used. Trauma is not synonymous with a traumatic event, nor is it synonymous with a psychiatric diagnosis such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). People respond differently to traumatic experiences, and not everyone who experiences a traumatic event develops a trauma-related disorder.
Trauma may also be cumulative. A person may not be able to identify one particular traumatic event but may instead experience the cumulative effects of repeated adversity over time. Trauma can also affect individuals, families, communities, and, in some contexts, subsequent generations. The type, duration, developmental timing, and context of trauma all can influence its effects.
The prevalence of trauma helps explain why this matters for the church. A multinational study conducted through the World Health Organization’s World Mental Health Surveys found that approximately 70 percent of respondents had experienced at least one traumatic event.² The study included a wide range of experiences, including war, violence, sexual and intimate-partner violence, accidents, serious illness, traumatic death, and witnessing traumatic experiences involving others.
The church is not immune. The American Bible Society’s Trauma Healing Institute surveyed more than thirteen thousand pastors and church leaders in the United States in 2022 regarding their experiences of trauma and the prevalence of trauma within their congregations. The report found substantial exposure to trauma among pastors and church leaders and significant levels of trauma reported within congregations.³
These statistics should not turn trauma into a label by which we define people. Rather, they remind us that when we gather for worship, it is reasonable to assume that some among us have experienced significant trauma and may carry its effects with them into the sanctuary.
Trauma can affect a person’s sense of safety, relationships, body, identity, memory, and perception of the world. Its effects may persist long after the original event has ended. Trauma is not something a person simply “gets over.”
At the same time, healing should not be understood as erasing what happened. Good Friday comes before Easter. The resurrection cannot be separated from the horror of the crucifixion. Likewise, our own experiences of renewal and new life do not require pretending that what came before did not happen. For some people, “remaking” may be a more helpful image than simply “healing.” Life can be made new without the past being erased.
This matters for the church because the people who gather for worship are not leaving their histories at the sanctuary door.
Worship in this article is understood as a ritual event occurring within a community whose primary focus is God. Historically, Christian worship has often been understood as an enactment of our relationship with the Creator through a kind of dialogical conversation: God speaks and we respond. In my own tradition, that conversation reaches a particular fullness in the proclamation of God’s word and the celebration of the sacraments.
We must protect this central purpose.
Worship is inherently formative, but its primary purpose is not education. Worship can be a powerful context for remaking, but it is not therapy. The worship leader is not a therapist, and the worship service should not become a substitute for professional mental health care.
At the same time, worship forms people. The way worship is planned and led can either support or undermine a person’s ability to participate. Worship can be a place where the Holy Spirit works powerfully in the hearts and lives of people, but the church can also cause deep spiritual and emotional injury through coercion, manipulation, abuse, exclusion, or careless pastoral practice.
Trauma-informed worship recognizes that our gatherings are, first and foremost, encounters with the holy, triune God, but it also attends to the ways trauma may affect how people experience safety, agency, embodiment, relationships, and participation.
Trauma-informed worship, therefore, seeks to remove unnecessary barriers to worship without attempting to remove every possibility of discomfort or distress.
It is also important to distinguish trauma-informed worship from trauma-centric worship. Trauma does not become the focus of the service. We do not gather primarily to process trauma. We gather to worship God. Trauma-informed worship simply refuses to pretend that trauma is absent from the people gathered.
This is where trauma-informed worship becomes more than a collection of techniques.
Christian worship leaders are entrusted with the care of people who come before God carrying the fullness of their lives. The priestly task is not to manipulate people into particular emotional or physical responses, but to help steward a space in which the people of God can faithfully encounter God together.
This requires attentiveness.
Trauma often involves experiences in which agency, safety, trust, or bodily autonomy were violated. Therefore, practices that unnecessarily reproduce coercion, unpredictability, humiliation, or loss of agency deserve careful examination.
This does not mean worship should be organized around the avoidance of every discomfort. Christianity itself contains practices that can be uncomfortable. Confession, repentance, lament, the proclamation of judgment, the cross, and the call to discipleship all can challenge us deeply.
The question is not whether worship will ever be uncomfortable.
The question is whether we are creating unnecessary threat, coercion, unpredictability, or shame when we do not need to.
In this sense, trauma-informed worship can be understood as a priestly act, an act of pastoral attentiveness that takes seriously the people entrusted to our care while keeping God at the center of worship.
Trauma-informed practices commonly emphasize several principles that are particularly relevant to worship. Drawing on established trauma-informed care frameworks,⁴ I have adapted these principles for the context of Christian worship:
These principles do not replace theology. They help us apply our theology with greater pastoral awareness.
The following suggestions should not be understood as a checklist for making worship “trauma-proof.” Nor should they be treated as universal requirements for every congregation.
They are practical expressions of a larger pastoral posture. Without that posture, trauma-informed practices can easily become techniques applied to people rather than ways of attending to people.
The goal is to reduce unnecessary sources of threat, coercion, unpredictability, and loss of agency while creating conditions in which people can authentically worship.
Learn more:
Before introducing trauma-informed practices, do the necessary groundwork. Trauma is complex, and its effects depend on the type of trauma experienced, its duration, the age at which it occurred, and its impact on the individual or community.
Know your community. Study the impact of the sources of trauma most prevalent among the people you serve.
What trauma looks like and what a person needs may vary dramatically among, for example, an immigrant from Rwanda, someone who experienced a deadly automobile accident, and a community rebuilding after a natural disaster.
If you are not willing to learn more, do not venture into this area casually.
Lay the groundwork:
Conduct an internal and external assessment.
Examine your church’s existing policies concerning personal safety, abuse prevention, children, vulnerable adults, emergency procedures, and pastoral care.
Ask questions such as:
Are there people or demographic groups present in the surrounding community who are largely absent from the congregation? If so, why?
Do not assume that you know the answers. Ask—and listen.
Crawl before you walk:
Before introducing extensive trauma-informed language or practices, consider whether your congregation is comfortable with lament.
Scripture, particularly the psalms, gives God’s people language for bringing our pain into God’s presence. If sorrow and pain are rarely acknowledged in worship, or if mental illness is treated as a sign of weakness or lack of faith, more fundamental work may be necessary first.
Begin by modeling authenticity as leaders. This does not require sharing your most personal thoughts or feelings. Leaders need appropriate boundaries. But we should not be afraid to name past struggles, current questions, or even doubts while continuing to testify to faith.
Honesty and faith are not necessarily in conflict. Often they exist together.
Be prepared
When a congregation begins creating greater space for trauma and honest testimony, people may begin sharing their stories.
Sometimes they will need more than a pastor, worship leader, or volunteer can provide.
Those in pastoral roles should identify their boundaries and honor them. If your congregation does not already have relationships with mental health professionals or counseling organizations, consider developing a network of trusted resources that can be recommended when appropriate.
Also come armed with patience.
Remaking life and realigning one’s sense of safety is rarely quick. For some, the journey may never be entirely finished. Do not equate a person’s level of faith with their speed or ability to heal from trauma.
The path is rarely linear.
Ask:
This is only a beginning.
What helps one congregation may not help another. Trauma-informed practice is not a once-and-done evaluation; it is a continuing posture of listening and adjustment.
Know your people. Ask them what they need. Then listen to their answers.
There is also a difficult reality: we cannot guarantee a completely safe worship space.
We can work toward safety. We can remove unnecessary barriers. We can establish trustworthy practices. But no congregation can anticipate every person’s history or eliminate every possible trigger.
That limitation should not lead us to give up. It should lead us to greater humility.
One challenge of trauma-informed worship is that trauma can affect a person’s bodily experience, as worship itself is deeply embodied.
Raising hands, kneeling, dancing, silence, singing, sitting, standing, or remaining still can all be meaningful acts of worship. Yet any one of these practices can also be uncomfortable or activating for particular people.
Worship should therefore avoid assuming that one particular bodily posture or mode of participation is spiritually normative in every circumstance.
This flows from both our understanding of trauma and our understanding of worship.
Worship is a response, not coercion.
Faithful worship cannot ultimately be produced by manipulating people into particular bodily or emotional responses.
Whenever the nature of a particular practice permits it, worshipers should have meaningful freedom to participate, modify their posture, or decline without shame or coercion.
Language should therefore be invitational and permission-giving rather than demanding.
Instead of “Please come forward,” consider saying, “If you are comfortable, you are invited to come forward,” suggesting it’s OK to remain in one’s seat.
Instead of assuming everyone will come forward, greet others, sing, raise their hands, kneel, or participate in a particular activity, provide meaningful alternatives when possible. This includes physical touch. Do not assume that everyone wants a hug, handshake, or other physical contact.
Sacramental practices require particular pastoral and theological consideration because different Christian traditions understand participation differently. Nevertheless, pastoral wisdom can often provide alternatives. For example, communion may sometimes be brought to individuals who wish to remain in their seats.
The principle is not that every worship practice must become optional. The principle is that where meaningful choice is possible, we should avoid unnecessary coercion.
This benefits more than just those who have experienced trauma. It can also help people with health conditions, ADHD, disabilities, sensory sensitivities, or temporary physical limitations.
Trauma-informed worship makes room for authentic prayer.
The psalms model a broad spectrum of human emotion, including fear, grief, anger, confusion, hope, joy, and trust. Such prayers are directed toward God. They ask God to intervene and bring justice while recognizing that justice ultimately belongs to God.
Pay attention to language.
When we pray about trauma, pain, or suffering, do we speak only about “those people” outside the congregation, or do we recognize that hurt that exists within our own community?
Instead of only praying for “those who have experienced trauma,” can we sometimes pray for “those of us who have experienced trauma”?
Are people who have experienced trauma implicitly portrayed as less faithful, less whole, or less capable than others? Or are they recognized as full members of the body of Christ?
Worship can provide space for remembering and naming what has happened. But storytelling should never become an expectation or a paradigm of spiritual virtue. People should not have to disclose their trauma in order to demonstrate faith.
When stories are told, they should not be rushed. This requires a community that knows how to listen patiently and lovingly, a community willing to hold space for what is uncomfortable and who has made peace with the fact that not everything can be immediately fixed.
Scripture is filled with stories of individual and communal trauma. Sometimes we pass over those stories by choosing another passage. At other times we preach the passage but gloss over the trauma within it by reducing the text to a simple moral lesson.
Trauma-informed preaching can ask deeper questions:
These questions do not make preaching into therapy. Instead, they can help us attend more faithfully to the biblical text and to the people who hear it.
When we take the pain, hurt, suffering, and trauma within scripture seriously, we can help congregants recognize that their own stories do not exist outside the story of God’s people. Their lives, like scripture itself, exist within the larger arc of creation, fall, redemption, and recreation.
Trauma-informed worship is not psychological jargon, a new theology, or merely a catchphrase. But neither is it easy. It is messy.
One of the greatest challenges is a difficult catch-22: sometimes the church itself is the problem.
The church can become a source of trauma through spiritual abuse, mishandled disclosures, victim blaming, coercive leadership, inappropriate touch, purity culture, forced forgiveness, simplistic theologies of suffering, or treating mental illness as evidence of spiritual failure.
When the church has caused harm, trauma-informed worship cannot be separated from institutional repentance. The church must be willing to admit the harm it has caused, seek forgiveness, pursue restitution where possible, and make necessary structural changes.
A trauma-informed worship service cannot compensate for an unsafe institution. Changing the lighting while ignoring abuse does not make a church trauma informed. Providing a quiet room while mishandling disclosures does not make a church trauma informed.
Trauma-informed ministry must therefore include accountability, safeguarding, appropriate pastoral boundaries, and institutional reform.
Another challenge is that what helps one person may negatively affect another. Touch can be comforting to one person and distressing to another. Music, smells, images, language, or particular rituals may evoke memories or emotions that leaders could never have anticipated.
This complexity should not cause us to give up. Instead, it should make us more attentive.
Ask. Listen. Remain willing to adjust.
Perhaps the most important posture is remembering that people who have experienced trauma are not projects.
Even as we seek to become trauma informed, we must resist turning trauma-informed ministry into a program relegated to a committee. It should become part of the congregation’s culture, an outgrowth of our call to care for one another, to be Christ to one another, and to hold space for one another.
Just as we learn about the unique needs and challenges facing children, youth, older adults, or people with physical disabilities, we can learn about the needs and challenges facing those who have experienced trauma.
And as we do so, we should also make space for the gifts, wisdom, perspectives, and forms of resilience shaped in part by what people have experienced. They are not merely people who have been wounded. They are members of the body of Christ.
Trauma-informed worship does not promise that worship will never hurt.
It does not promise that every person will feel safe every moment.
It does not make the worship leader a therapist.
It does not make trauma the center of worship.
Instead, trauma-informed worship asks the church to take seriously that the people standing, sitting, singing, praying, kneeling, receiving, and listening before God are embodied human beings whose histories come with them into the room.
It asks us to remove unnecessary barriers to participation, preserve agency where possible, attend carefully to our language and practices, and acknowledge the ways the church can both nurture healing and cause harm.
Ultimately, this is not simply about adopting a set of techniques. It is about the way we understand our pastoral responsibility.
Trauma-informed worship is a way of living out the priestly calling given to all God’s people, and particularly to those entrusted with leadership.
The goal is not to create a perfectly safe or perfectly predictable worship service. The goal is to become a community attentive enough to notice where we may be creating unnecessary barriers, humble enough to listen when someone tells us we have caused harm, courageous enough to change, and faithful enough to continue pointing beyond ourselves to the God whom we gather to worship.
Good Friday still comes before Easter.
Lament still belongs in the life of God’s people.
The scars of resurrection do not erase the wounds that preceded it.
So we gather as wounded and hopeful people before the wounded and risen Christ, trusting that the Holy Spirit can work through our imperfect efforts.
May we therefore pray together:
Healer of our every ill,
light of each tomorrow,
give us peace beyond our fear,
and hope beyond our sorrow.
—Marty Haugen, refrain, “Healer of Our Every Ill,” © 1987 GIA Publications, Inc.
This reflection grows out of a broader conversation about trauma-informed care, pastoral ministry, Christian worship, embodiment, lament, and the church’s responsibility to create communities marked by safety, trust, agency, and welcome. The sources below have informed my thinking and provide opportunities for further exploration.
This article is a synthesis and contextual application rather than a summary of any single source. The principles of trauma-informed care—particularly safety, trust and transparency, collaboration and mutuality, empowerment and choice, and attention to cultural, historical, and gender contexts—draw on established trauma-informed care frameworks. In this reflection, I have adapted those principles to the particular context of Christian worship and pastoral leadership. The theological connections, questions, examples, and practical suggestions represent my own attempt to consider what trauma-informed principles might look like when embodied in the worship life of a congregation.
American Psychological Association. “Trauma.” In APA Dictionary of Psychology. Accessed July 5, 2026.https://dictionary.apa.org/trauma.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “About Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs).” March 2, 2026.https://www.cdc.gov/aces/index.html.
Kessler, Ronald C., Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola, Jordi Alonso, Somnath Chatterji, Luis de Girolamo, Koen Demyttenaere, Giovanni de Girolamo, et al. “Trauma and PTSD in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys.” BJPsych Open 8, suppl. 5 (2017): 1353383. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5632781/.
Koenen, Karestan C., Annelise Ratanatharathorn, et al. “Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the World Mental Health Surveys.” Psychological Medicine 47, no. 13 (2017): 2260–74. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/7DB941D95BB33FCC18BF52DFB3F78197/S0033291717000708a.pdf/posttraumatic-stress-disorder-in-the-world-mental-health-surveys.pdf
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. SAMHSA’s Concept of Trauma and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4884. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014. https://library.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/sma14-4884.pdf.
Trauma Healing Institute, American Bible Society. US Church Report. Accessed July 9, 2026. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6426f18785ef0f530ff90208/t/6446e226ced50f12e93dd358/1691014687336/THI+-+US+Church+Report.
World Health Organization. “Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.” May 27, 2024. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/post-traumatic-stress-disorder.
Longfield, Nathan. “Nathan Longfield on Embodiment, Creativity and Trauma-informed Worship.” Public Worship and the Christian Life. Calvin Institute of Christian Worship, December 10, 2024. https://worship.calvin.edu/resources/podcasts/nathan-longfield-embodiment-creativity-and-trauma-informed-worship.
Kim-Cragg, HyeRan, and Mona Tokarek LaFosse. “HyeRan Kim-Cragg and Mona Tokarek LaFosse on Trauma-Informed Worship.” Calvin Institute of Christian Worship, March 31, 2026. https://worship.calvin.edu/resources/articles/hyeran-kim-cragg-and-mona-tokarek-lafosse-trauma-informed-worship.
Huyser-Honig, Joan. “Worship Ideas From Around the World.” Calvin Institute of Christian Worship, February 14, 2012. https://worship.calvin.edu/resources/podcasts/nathan-longfield-embodiment-creativity-and-trauma-informed-worship.
Calvin Institute of Christian Worship. “What A Friend We Have in Jesus: Service of Prayer for Healing—Isaiah 61, Matthew 11.” June 1, 2005. https://worship.calvin.edu/resources/articles/what-friend-we-have-jesus-service-prayer-healing-isaiah-61-matthew-11.
1. American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Trauma. In APA Dictionary of Psychology. Retrieved July 5, 2026, from https://dictionary.apa.org/trauma.
2. “Trauma and PTSD in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys,” accessed July 9, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5632781/
3. Jeffery Fulks, “Trauma Healing and the U.S. Church,” Trauma Healing Institute, American Bible Society, accessed July 9, 2026, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6426f18785ef0f530ff90208/t/6446e226ced50f12e93dd358/1691014687336/THI+-+US+Church+Report.
4. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, “Trauma-Informed Approaches and Programs,” last modified February 8, 2026, https://www.samhsa.gov/mental-health/trauma-violence/trauma-informed-approaches-programs.
