Light and dark. Apple, fig leaf, ark, rainbow. Star, cross, 153 fish.
Taste and see that God is good. Abram, Jacob, Samuel, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Paul, and John—all vision struck. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his
glory.
Linen garments, branched candlesticks, curtains embroidered with cherubim. Stone, cedar, cypress, gold.
Soaring arches, stained glass, mosaic floors. Icons, robes, vestments, candles. Stencils on rice paper, catechetical posters, Holy Week processionals, images flickering across big screens.
Christians around the world have different ways of using visual arts in worship. Yet we worship the same Potter, who through the indwelling Spirit shapes us to become more like Christ Incarnate.
And as lush or austere as your own visual tradition may be, you can worship more deeply by considering why and how other Christians receive God’s revelation through what they see.
Opening yourself to new experiences of art in worship starts with questioning two assumptions.
First, many Christians value the verbal over the visual. We understand how the Holy Spirit uses the Bible, inspired preaching, and music to connect us with God. But linking art with worship stirs worries about idolatry, distraction, and poor stewardship.
Second, many of us think of art as something to look at in museums and galleries—something different thancraft, which is beautiful and useful.
God’s people have not always looked on art as an inferior (or impossible) way for the Holy Spirit to mediate God’s love to us. Nor have God’s people always seen art as disconnected from real life, which includes true worship.
God inspired artists to create a splendid tabernacle and temple. Jesus compared his crucifixion to the bronze serpent Moses made, a visual symbol of claiming God’s help through faith. He commanded believers to see themselves as one body in him and to experience this truth through table, bread, and wine, not just words.
For centuries, Christians offered gifts of imagination in the form of church furnishings, pageant props, sculptures, paintings, textiles, illustrated Bibles, and icons, which Orthodox Christians describe as “windows to heaven.”
The Protestant Reformers emphasized that believers can understand the Bible on their own and go to God directly through Christ. They got rid of most church art for fear people would pray to a saint rather than to God or would worship an image or its artist instead of the Creator. They believed visually stark worship spaces help Christians focus on the Bible and sermon.
Outside church walls, even Protestants continued to appreciate well-made objects, whether pictures or pitchers. Protestant artists often created art for or about ordinary life, while Catholic artists stuck to religious themes.
During the 18th century Age of Enlightenment, art became further separated not only from the church but from ordinary life. Art academies, critics, journals, and museums created a split between what philosopher Nicholas Wolterstorff calls the “institution of high art” and craft. Fine art became narrowly defined as a special process of individual expression meant for aesthetic contemplation. This raises the danger of making art a religion.
In his classic Art in Action: Toward a Christian Aesthetic, Wolterstorff calls Christians “to extricate ourselves from the parochialism…of high art…and consider afresh…the role of art in the liturgy of the church.”
He proposes seeing “art as an instrument and object of action.” He explains that a worship liturgy is a dialogue between God and people. Within this dialogue, liturgical art can create a setting (banners, projected images) andgenerate actions (people walk forward to put checks and cash in colorful porcelain bowl) that serve a liturgical purpose (offering thanks to God).
Wolterstorff describes both art and liturgy as social practices. When he wrote Art in Action, he believed art used in worship should serve the liturgy. “Now I think that that is too simplistic. There needs to be a negotiation in which neither the practice of liturgy nor the practices of art ‘call the shots,’ ” he says.
Cautioning against an exuberant mix-and-match, Wolterstorff says that liturgical art must fit the congregation’s self-understanding and the artistic elements must form a whole.
The liturgical year shapes how people understand themselves at Church of the Servant Christian Reformed Church in Grand Rapids, Michigan. During Epiphany they look with new eyes for Jesus, the light of the world. The Epiphany Eyes banner and other visual elements convey this theme. References to light and sight pepper the Epiphany liturgy and songs.
Wolterstorff says art is a way of showing, as no other activity can, something about the world’s depth and reality. Artists create possible worlds that help people envision (or rebel against) the final shalom God will create when Christ returns to completely renew creation.
Looking at the world through this creation-fall-redemption-renewal pattern makes every liturgy’s final section—the sending—especially important. Renewed in worship, Christians go back into daily life to bring about shalom, according to how God has gifted them.
Still convinced that art is mainly for looking at? Lisa DeBoer, a Westmont College art professor, lists many more roles for art, each appropriate for worship: “Art can create identity. Art can define space. Art can dramatize the parts of worship. Art can interpret the sacraments. Art can shape movement. Art can mark time. Art can anchor memory.”
Besides broadening art’s role beyond contemplation, DeBoer urges artists to think beyond individual self expression. While working with student artists in worship renewal projects, she discovered it’s crucial to help artists define and discuss their unspoken assumptions about art.
She also discovered a model that can work well in churches. She paired each artist with a group of non-artist friends for a Stations of Christ’s Life project. Group members read and prayed through the biblical narrative relevant to “their” part of Christ’s life. Each artist consulted with his or her group on how to create a work that others could understand and appreciate. Artists also met weekly with each other.
“This formula proved extremely successful,” DeBoer says. While supporting and pushing the artists in new creative directions, the non-artists began to appreciate the artistic process and came to love the art. The artists learned the joy of creating something for a community.
This visual arts resource directory includes downloadable images, artists’ websites, and art events. Find images keyed to the lectionary. Browse dozens of websites about Christian modern art, including A Broken Beauty.
Learn the story behind biblical and Christian symbols in Elizabeth Steele Halstead’s new Visuals for Worship, which includes downloadable images on CD. It’s designed as a companion to The Worship Sourcebook.
Enrich your syllabi. Sing songs celebrating the arts.
Evaluate the risks and rewards of using more art. Read this Lutheran Church of Australia statement on the purpose of visual arts in worship. Then consider writing an arts purpose statement for your congregation.
Form a visual faith discussion group. Start with an essay or conference presentation. Graduate to good books on Christians and art, including some from Lisa DeBoer’s annotated list.
Write book reviews and donate books to your church library:
Congregational Resource Guide recommends several resources on art, architecture, and worship, includingChurch Architecture Network, Built of Living Stones: Art, Architecture, and Worship, which gives guidelines for renovating or building Catholic churches, and Patricia S. Klein’s Worship Without Words: The Signs and Symbols of Our Faith.
Browse related stories on art that preaches, church renovation, and how congregations are incorporating visual art.
What is the best way you’ve found to explore visual arts in worship?
David R Scutt | Posted Sep 02, 2011 11:52 AM
Loved the article. I make and paint altarpieces, have been on a quest for years to add visual art to our protestant worship. No easy task. So many mainstreat artists today are decidedly anti-christian. Just the in thing to be. The Catholic church soldiers on however, the backbone of religious art. In my view, all great art swirls away from the early church art. Will always cause Angst with the art critics. And, looking at M's "David," you immediately question if mere man, without some kind of infusion, could actually creat such art. David S.
DLa Rue | Posted Jan 20, 2012 11:51 AM
Thanks for this. In my work as a liturgical dance historian, choreographer, and liturgical planner, I find so that many of these issues arise because there is as yet insufficient training for pastors, priests and minsters in the language and process of art. Conversations about the place of the arts in the life of faith, and about the ways the arts can become more communicative in the expression of faith, are so important. Our schools and the communities that fund them contribute to the difficulty as well, whether located in the home or in a public setting: the arts are subordinated to sports in both funding and communal support, so that parishioners bring to their faith an incompletely literate understanding of the visual and performative arts as well. It is good to know that some of these deficiencies are being addressed now; a disciplined study of the arts truly has the potential to broaden and deepen faith.
David R. Scutt | Posted Jan 20, 2012 04:55 PM
Thanks DLa Rue for the comments. I used material from this webpage for a recent presentation, art and the contemporary church, it was very helpful. Years ago started a project to add art to my local church. Much like the old repeated "all politics are local," decided that whatever small influence I had concerning church art by necessity had to start with my own sphere of influence, my local church. I am part of a large church, very above average education level, lots of academic career members and such. And much to my dismay, received a very mixed reaction at the start. So, found that a big component of adding art to our liturgical thinking and practice, can be the slow process of plodding along, always pushing the idea of broadening our views, and just staying the course. Our change has certainly enriched my church life, and I hope it has benefitted all of us. It has certainly made us more aware of the opportunities thru art in spreading the message of hope and salvation in our fast changeing culture.